15.5: Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis - Biology

Skills to Develop

  • Describe the different steps in protein synthesis
  • Discuss the role of ribosomes in protein synthesis

The synthesis of proteins consumes more of a cell’s energy than any other metabolic process. In turn, proteins account for more mass than any other component of living organisms (with the exception of water), and proteins perform virtually every function of a cell. The process of translation, or protein synthesis, involves the decoding of an mRNA message into a polypeptide product. Amino acids are covalently strung together by interlinking peptide bonds in lengths ranging from approximately 50 amino acid residues to more than 1,000. Each individual amino acid has an amino group (NH2) and a carboxyl (COOH) group. Polypeptides are formed when the amino group of one amino acid forms an amide (i.e., peptide) bond with the carboxyl group of another amino acid (Figure (PageIndex{1})). This reaction is catalyzed by ribosomes and generates one water molecule.

The Protein Synthesis Machinery

In addition to the mRNA template, many molecules and macromolecules contribute to the process of translation. The composition of each component may vary across species; for instance, ribosomes may consist of different numbers of rRNAs and polypeptides depending on the organism. However, the general structures and functions of the protein synthesis machinery are comparable from bacteria to human cells. Translation requires the input of an mRNA template, ribosomes, tRNAs, and various enzymatic factors.

Link to Learning

Click through the steps of this PBS interactive to see protein synthesis in action.


Even before an mRNA is translated, a cell must invest energy to build each of its ribosomes. In E. coli, there are between 10,000 and 70,000 ribosomes present in each cell at any given time. A ribosome is a complex macromolecule composed of structural and catalytic rRNAs, and many distinct polypeptides. In eukaryotes, the nucleolus is completely specialized for the synthesis and assembly of rRNAs.

Ribosomes exist in the cytoplasm in prokaryotes and in the cytoplasm and rough endoplasmic reticulum in eukaryotes. Mitochondria and chloroplasts also have their own ribosomes in the matrix and stroma, which look more similar to prokaryotic ribosomes (and have similar drug sensitivities) than the ribosomes just outside their outer membranes in the cytoplasm. Ribosomes dissociate into large and small subunits when they are not synthesizing proteins and reassociate during the initiation of translation. coli, the small subunit is described as 30S, and the large subunit is 50S, for a total of 70S (recall that Svedberg units are not additive). Mammalian ribosomes have a small 40S subunit and a large 60S subunit, for a total of 80S. The small subunit is responsible for binding the mRNA template, whereas the large subunit sequentially binds tRNAs. Each mRNA molecule is simultaneously translated by many ribosomes, all synthesizing protein in the same direction: reading the mRNA from 5' to 3' and synthesizing the polypeptide from the N terminus to the C terminus. The complete mRNA/poly-ribosome structure is called a polysome.


The tRNAs are structural RNA molecules that were transcribed from genes by RNA polymerase III. Depending on the species, 40 to 60 types of tRNAs exist in the cytoplasm. Serving as adaptors, specific tRNAs bind to sequences on the mRNA template and add the corresponding amino acid to the polypeptide chain. Therefore, tRNAs are the molecules that actually “translate” the language of RNA into the language of proteins.

Of the 64 possible mRNA codons—or triplet combinations of A, U, G, and C—three specify the termination of protein synthesis and 61 specify the addition of amino acids to the polypeptide chain. Of these 61, one codon (AUG) also encodes the initiation of translation. Each tRNA anticodon can base pair with one of the mRNA codons and add an amino acid or terminate translation, according to the genetic code. For instance, if the sequence CUA occurred on an mRNA template in the proper reading frame, it would bind a tRNA expressing the complementary sequence, GAU, which would be linked to the amino acid leucine.

As the adaptor molecules of translation, it is surprising that tRNAs can fit so much specificity into such a small package. Consider that tRNAs need to interact with three factors: 1) they must be recognized by the correct aminoacyl synthetase (see below); 2) they must be recognized by ribosomes; and 3) they must bind to the correct sequence in mRNA.

Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetases

The process of pre-tRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase III only creates the RNA portion of the adaptor molecule. The corresponding amino acid must be added later, once the tRNA is processed and exported to the cytoplasm. Through the process of tRNA “charging,” each tRNA molecule is linked to its correct amino acid by a group of enzymes called aminoacyl tRNA synthetases. At least one type of aminoacyl tRNA synthetase exists for each of the 20 amino acids; the exact number of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases varies by species. These enzymes first bind and hydrolyze ATP to catalyze a high-energy bond between an amino acid and adenosine monophosphate (AMP); a pyrophosphate molecule is expelled in this reaction. The activated amino acid is then transferred to the tRNA, and AMP is released.

The Mechanism of Protein Synthesis

As with mRNA synthesis, protein synthesis can be divided into three phases: initiation, elongation, and termination. The process of translation is similar in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Here we’ll explore how translation occurs in E. coli, a representative prokaryote, and specify any differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic translation.

Initiation of Translation

Protein synthesis begins with the formation of an initiation complex. coli, this complex involves the small 30S ribosome, the mRNA template, three initiation factors (IFs; IF-1, IF-2, and IF-3), and a special initiator tRNA, called ( ext{tRNA}_f^{Met}). The initiator tRNA interacts with the start codon AUG (or rarely, GUG), links to a formylated methionine called fMet, and can also bind IF-2. Formylated methionine is inserted by ( ext{fMet} - ext{tRNA}_f^{Met}) at the beginning of every polypeptide chain synthesized by E. coli, but it is usually clipped off after translation is complete. When an in-frame AUG is encountered during translation elongation, a non-formylated methionine is inserted by a regular Met-tRNAMet.

In E. coli mRNA, a sequence upstream of the first AUG codon, called the Shine-Dalgarno sequence (AGGAGG), interacts with the rRNA molecules that compose the ribosome. This interaction anchors the 30S ribosomal subunit at the correct location on the mRNA template. Guanosine triphosphate (GTP), which is a purine nucleotide triphosphate, acts as an energy source during translation—both at the start of elongation and during the ribosome’s translocation.

In eukaryotes, a similar initiation complex forms, comprising mRNA, the 40S small ribosomal subunit, IFs, and nucleoside triphosphates (GTP and ATP). The charged initiator tRNA, called Met-tRNAi, does not bind fMet in eukaryotes, but is distinct from other Met-tRNAs in that it can bind IFs.

Instead of depositing at the Shine-Dalgarno sequence, the eukaryotic initiation complex recognizes the 7-methylguanosine cap at the 5' end of the mRNA. A cap-binding protein (CBP) and several other IFs assist the movement of the ribosome to the 5' cap. Once at the cap, the initiation complex tracks along the mRNA in the 5' to 3' direction, searching for the AUG start codon. Many eukaryotic mRNAs are translated from the first AUG, but this is not always the case. According to Kozak’s rules, the nucleotides around the AUG indicate whether it is the correct start codon. Kozak’s rules state that the following consensus sequence must appear around the AUG of vertebrate genes: 5'-gccRccAUGG-3'. The R (for purine) indicates a site that can be either A or G, but cannot be C or U. Essentially, the closer the sequence is to this consensus, the higher the efficiency of translation.

Once the appropriate AUG is identified, the other proteins and CBP dissociate, and the 60S subunit binds to the complex of Met-tRNAi, mRNA, and the 40S subunit. This step completes the initiation of translation in eukaryotes.

Translation, Elongation, and Termination

In prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the basics of elongation are the same, so we will review elongation from the perspective of E. coli. The 50S ribosomal subunit of E. coli consists of three compartments: the A (aminoacyl) site binds incoming charged aminoacyl tRNAs. The P (peptidyl) site binds charged tRNAs carrying amino acids that have formed peptide bonds with the growing polypeptide chain but have not yet dissociated from their corresponding tRNA. The E (exit) site releases dissociated tRNAs so that they can be recharged with free amino acids. There is one exception to this assembly line of tRNAs: in E. coli, ( ext{fMet} - ext{tRNA}_f^{Met}) is capable of entering the P site directly without first entering the A site. Similarly, the eukaryotic Met-tRNAi, with help from other proteins of the initiation complex, binds directly to the P site. In both cases, this creates an initiation complex with a free A site ready to accept the tRNA corresponding to the first codon after the AUG.

During translation elongation, the mRNA template provides specificity. As the ribosome moves along the mRNA, each mRNA codon comes into register, and specific binding with the corresponding charged tRNA anticodon is ensured. If mRNA were not present in the elongation complex, the ribosome would bind tRNAs nonspecifically.

Elongation proceeds with charged tRNAs entering the A site and then shifting to the P site followed by the E site with each single-codon “step” of the ribosome. Ribosomal steps are induced by conformational changes that advance the ribosome by three bases in the 3' direction. The energy for each step of the ribosome is donated by an elongation factor that hydrolyzes GTP. Peptide bonds form between the amino group of the amino acid attached to the A-site tRNA and the carboxyl group of the amino acid attached to the P-site tRNA. The formation of each peptide bond is catalyzed by peptidyl transferase, an RNA-based enzyme that is integrated into the 50S ribosomal subunit. The energy for each peptide bond formation is derived from GTP hydrolysis, which is catalyzed by a separate elongation factor. The amino acid bound to the P-site tRNA is also linked to the growing polypeptide chain. As the ribosome steps across the mRNA, the former P-site tRNA enters the E site, detaches from the amino acid, and is expelled (Figure (PageIndex{2})). Amazingly, the E. coli translation apparatus takes only 0.05 seconds to add each amino acid, meaning that a 200-amino acid protein can be translated in just 10 seconds.

Art Connection

Many antibiotics inhibit bacterial protein synthesis. For example, tetracycline blocks the A site on the bacterial ribosome, and chloramphenicol blocks peptidyl transfer. What specific effect would you expect each of these antibiotics to have on protein synthesis?

Tetracycline would directly affect:

  1. tRNA binding to the ribosome
  2. ribosome assembly
  3. growth of the protein chain

Chloramphenicol would directly affect

  1. tRNA binding to the ribosome
  2. ribosome assembly
  3. growth of the protein chain

Termination of translation occurs when a nonsense codon (UAA, UAG, or UGA) is encountered. Upon aligning with the A site, these nonsense codons are recognized by release factors in prokaryotes and eukaryotes that instruct peptidyl transferase to add a water molecule to the carboxyl end of the P-site amino acid. This reaction forces the P-site amino acid to detach from its tRNA, and the newly made protein is released. The small and large ribosomal subunits dissociate from the mRNA and from each other; they are recruited almost immediately into another translation initiation complex. After many ribosomes have completed translation, the mRNA is degraded so the nucleotides can be reused in another transcription reaction.

Protein Folding, Modification, and Targeting

During and after translation, individual amino acids may be chemically modified, signal sequences may be appended, and the new protein “folds” into a distinct three-dimensional structure as a result of intramolecular interactions. A signal sequence is a short tail of amino acids that directs a protein to a specific cellular compartment. These sequences at the amino end or the carboxyl end of the protein can be thought of as the protein’s “train ticket” to its ultimate destination. Other cellular factors recognize each signal sequence and help transport the protein from the cytoplasm to its correct compartment. For instance, a specific sequence at the amino terminus will direct a protein to the mitochondria or chloroplasts (in plants). Once the protein reaches its cellular destination, the signal sequence is usually clipped off.

Many proteins fold spontaneously, but some proteins require helper molecules, called chaperones, to prevent them from aggregating during the complicated process of folding. Even if a protein is properly specified by its corresponding mRNA, it could take on a completely dysfunctional shape if abnormal temperature or pH conditions prevent it from folding correctly.


The players in translation include the mRNA template, ribosomes, tRNAs, and various enzymatic factors. The small ribosomal subunit forms on the mRNA template either at the Shine-Dalgarno sequence (prokaryotes) or the 5' cap (eukaryotes). Translation begins at the initiating AUG on the mRNA, specifying methionine. The formation of peptide bonds occurs between sequential amino acids specified by the mRNA template according to the genetic code. Charged tRNAs enter the ribosomal A site, and their amino acid bonds with the amino acid at the P site. The entire mRNA is translated in three-nucleotide “steps” of the ribosome. When a nonsense codon is encountered, a release factor binds and dissociates the components and frees the new protein. Folding of the protein occurs during and after translation.

Art Connections

[link] Many antibiotics inhibit bacterial protein synthesis. What specific effect would you expect each of these antibiotics to have on protein synthesis?

Tetracycline would directly affect:

  1. tRNA binding to the ribosome
  2. ribosome assembly
  3. growth of the protein chain

Chloramphenicol would directly affect

  1. tRNA binding to the ribosome
  2. ribosome assembly
  3. growth of the protein chain

[link] Tetracycline: a; Chloramphenicol: c.

Review Questions

The RNA components of ribosomes are synthesized in the ________.

  1. cytoplasm
  2. nucleus
  3. nucleolus
  4. endoplasmic reticulum


In any given species, there are at least how many types of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases?

  1. 20
  2. 40
  3. 100
  4. 200


Free Response

Transcribe and translate the following DNA sequence (nontemplate strand): 5'-ATGGCCGGTTATTAAGCA-3'

The mRNA would be: 5'-AUGGCCGGUUAUUAAGCA-3'. The protein would be: MAGY. Even though there are six codons, the fifth codon corresponds to a stop, so the sixth codon would not be translated.

Explain how single nucleotide changes can have vastly different effects on protein function.

Nucleotide changes in the third position of codons may not change the amino acid and would have no effect on the protein. Other nucleotide changes that change important amino acids or create or delete start or stop codons would have severe effects on the amino acid sequence of the protein.


aminoacyl tRNA synthetase
enzyme that “charges” tRNA molecules by catalyzing a bond between the tRNA and a corresponding amino acid
initiator tRNA
in prokaryotes, called ( ext{tRNA}_f^{Met}); in eukaryotes, called tRNAi; a tRNA that interacts with a start codon, binds directly to the ribosome P site, and links to a special methionine to begin a polypeptide chain
Kozak’s rules
determines the correct initiation AUG in a eukaryotic mRNA; the following consensus sequence must appear around the AUG: 5’-GCC(purine)CCAUGG-3’; the bolded bases are most important
peptidyl transferase
RNA-based enzyme that is integrated into the 50S ribosomal subunit and catalyzes the formation of peptide bonds
mRNA molecule simultaneously being translated by many ribosomes all going in the same direction
Shine-Dalgarno sequence
(AGGAGG); initiates prokaryotic translation by interacting with rRNA molecules comprising the 30S ribosome
signal sequence
short tail of amino acids that directs a protein to a specific cellular compartment
start codon
AUG (or rarely, GUG) on an mRNA from which translation begins; always specifies methionine

15.5 Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis

The synthesis of proteins consumes more of a cell’s energy than any other metabolic process. In turn, proteins account for more mass than any other component of living organisms (with the exception of water), and proteins perform virtually every function of a cell. The process of translation, or protein synthesis, involves the decoding of an mRNA message into a polypeptide product. Amino acids are covalently strung together by interlinking peptide bonds in lengths ranging from approximately 50 amino acid residues to more than 1,000. Each individual amino acid has an amino group (NH2) and a carboxyl (COOH) group. Polypeptides are formed when the amino group of one amino acid forms an amide (i.e., peptide) bond with the carboxyl group of another amino acid (Figure). This reaction is catalyzed by ribosomes and generates one water molecule.

A peptide bond links the carboxyl end of one amino acid with the amino end of another, expelling one water molecule. For simplicity in this image, only the functional groups involved in the peptide bond are shown. The R and R’ designations refer to the rest of each amino acid structure.

Ban, N., Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Moore, P. B. & Steitz, T. A. The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å resolution. Science 289, 905–920 (2000).First structure of an archaeal large ribosomal subunit with atomic resolution.

Schluenzen, F. et al. Structure of functionally activated small ribosomal subunit at 3.3 angstroms resolution. Cell 102, 615–623 (2000).

Wimberly, B. T. et al. Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature 407, 327–339 (2000).References 2 and 3 describe the structure of a bacterial small ribosomal subunit with atomic resolution.

Yusupov, M. M. et al. Crystal structure of the ribosome at 5.5 Å resolution. Science 292, 883–896 (2001).A near atomic (0.55 nm) resolution map of an entire bacterial ribosome bound by messenger RNAs and transfer RNAs. First detailed view of the intersubunit bridges.

Stark, H. et al. Arrangement of tRNAs in pre- and posttranslocational ribosomes revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. Cell 88, 19–28 (1997).

Stark, H. et al. Visualization of elongation factor Tu on the Escherichia coli ribosome. Nature 389, 403–406 (1997).

Mueller, F. et al. The 3D arrangement of the 23S and 5S rRNA in the Escherichia coli 50S ribosomal subunit based on a cryo-electron microscopic reconstruction at 7.5 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 298, 35–59 (2000).

Gabashvili, I. S. et al. Solution structure of the E. coli 70S ribosome at 11.5 Å resolution. Cell 100, 537–549 (2000).

Agrawal, R. K. et al. Direct visualization of A-, P-, and E-site transfer RNAs in the Escherichia coli ribosome. Science 271, 1000–1002 (1996).

Frank, J. et al. A model of protein synthesis based on cryo-electron microscopy of the E. coli ribosome. Nature 376, 441–444 (1995).

Mueller, F. & Brimacombe, R. A new model for the three-dimensional folding of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA. I. Fitting the RNA to a 3D electron microscopic map at 20 Å. J. Mol. Biol. 271, 524–544 (1997).

Ban, N. et al. A 9 Å resolution X-ray crystallographic map of the large ribosomal subunit. Cell 93, 1105–1115 (1998).

Ban, N. et al. Placement of protein and RNA structures into a 5 Å-resolution map of the 50S ribosomal subunit. Nature 400, 841–847 (1999).

Tocilj, A. et al. The small ribosomal subunit from Thermus thermophilus at 4.5 Å resolution: pattern fittings and the identification of a functional site. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14252–14257 (1999).

Cate, J. H., Yusupov, M. M., Yusupova, G. Z., Earnest, T. N. & Noller, H. F. X-ray crystal structures of 70S ribosome functional complexes. Science 285, 2095–2104 (1999).

Matadeen, R. et al. The Escherichia coli large ribosomal subunit at 7.5 Å resolution. Struct. Fold Des. 7, 1575–1583 (1999).

Ramakrishnan, V. & Moore, P. B. Atomic structures at last: the ribosome in 2000. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 144–154 (2001).The recent history of the ribosomal structure analysis reviewed.

Khaitovich, P., Mankin, A. S., Green, R., Lancaster, L. & Noller, H. F. Characterization of functionally active subribosomal particles from Thermus aquaticus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 85–90 (1999).

Dahlberg, A. E. The functional role of ribosomal RNA in protein synthesis. Cell 57, 525–529 (1989).

Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Ban, N., Moore, P. B. & Steitz, T. A. The structural basis of ribosome activity in peptide bond synthesis. Science 289, 920–930 (2000).The peptidyl-transferase centre is described as an RNA cage, with no proteins closer than 1.8 nm to the peptide bond to be synthesized. Peptide-bond formation is proposed to follow the rules of acid–base catalysis as described in serine proteases. The ribosome is described as a ribozyme. Also see references 35 and 36.

Agrawal, R. K. et al. Visualization of tRNA movements on the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome during the elongation cycle. J. Cell Biol. 150, 447–460 (2000).Three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions offering snapshot views on the principal positions occupied by transfer RNAs during elongation.

Frank, J. & Agrawal, R. K. A ratchet-like inter-subunit reorganization of the ribosome during translocation. Nature 406, 318–322 (2000).Three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy analysis of bacterial ribosomes in various functional states revealed a ratchet-like rotation of the small subunit relative to the large subunit upon EF-G binding and GTP hydrolysis.

Gabashvili, I. S. et al. Major rearrangements in the 70S ribosomal 3D structure caused by a conformational switch in 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 18, 6501–6507 (1999).

Stark, H., Rodnina, M. V., Wieden, H. J., van Heel, M. & Wintermeyer, W. Large-scale movement of elongation factor G and extensive conformational change of the ribosome during translocation. Cell 100, 301–309 (2000).

Agrawal, R. K., Penczek, P., Grassucci, R. A. & Frank, J. Visualization of elongation factor G on the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome: the mechanism of translocation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6134–6138 (1998).

Agrawal, R. K., Heagle, A. B., Penczek, P., Grassucci, R. A. & Frank, J. EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis induces translocation accompanied by large conformational changes in the 70S ribosome. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 643–647 (1999).

Brodersen, D. E. et al. The structural basis for the action of the antibiotics tetracycline, pactamycin, and hygromycin B on the 30S ribosomal subunit. Cell 103, 1143–1154 (2000).

Carter, A. P. et al. Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interactions with antibiotics. Nature 407, 340–348 (2000).

Porse, B. T. & Garrett, R. A. Ribosomal mechanics, antibiotics, and GTP hydrolysis. Cell 97, 423–426 (1999).

Ogle, J. M. et al. Recognition of cognate transfer RNA by the 30S ribosomal subunit. Science 292, 897–902 (2001).Insights into the decoding process. Demonstration that the geometry of the Watson–Crick base-pair interactions at the codon–anticodon is sensed by specific 16S ribosomal RNA residues upon binding of a cognate tRNA.

Muth, G. W., Ortoleva-Donnelly, L. & Strobel, S. A. A single adenosine with a neutral pKa in the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center. Science 289, 947–950 (2000).

Zhang, B. & Cech, T. R. Peptide bond formation by in vitro selected ribozymes. Nature 390, 96–100 (1997).

Zhang, B. & Cech, T. R. Peptidyl-transferase ribozymes: trans reactions, structural characterization and ribosomal RNA-like features. Chem. Biol. 5, 539–553 (1998).

Xiong, L. et al. Oxazolidinone resistance mutations in 23S rRNA of Escherichia coli reveal the central region of domain V as the primary site of drug action. J. Bacteriol. 182, 5325–5331 (2000).

Polacek, N., Gaynor, M., Yassin, A. & Mankin, A. S. Ribosomal peptidyl transferase can withstand mutations the putative catalytic residue. Nature 411, 498–501 (2001).Site-directed mutagenesis on ribosomal-RNA residues proposed to be involved in peptide-bond catalysis. The rRNA is proposed to position the reacting groups without directly participating in chemical catalysis.

Barta, A. et al. Mechanism of ribosomal peptide bond formation. Science 291, 203 (2001).Three short letters present a lively discussion of the current understanding of the peptidyl-transferase reaction.

Pugh, G. E., Nicol, S. M. & Fuller-Pace, F. V. Interaction of the Escherichia coli DEAD box protein DbpA with 23S ribosomal RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 771–778 (1999).

Dammel, C. S. & Noller, H. F. A cold-sensitive mutation in 16S rRNA provides evidence for helical switching in ribosome assembly. Genes Dev. 7, 660–670 (1993).

Colley, A., Beggs, J. D., Tollervey, D. & Lafontaine, D. L. Dhr1p, a putative DEAH-box RNA helicase, is associated with the box C+D snoRNP U3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 7238–7246 (2000).

Daugeron, M. C. & Linder, P. Characterization and mutational analysis of yeast Dbp8p, a putative RNA helicase involved in ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 1144–1155 (2001).

de la Cruz, J., Kressler, D. & Linder, P. Unwinding RNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: DEAD-box proteins and related families. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 192–198 (1999).

Traub, P. & Nomura, M. Structure and function of E. coli ribosomes. V. Reconstitution of functionally active 30S ribosomal particles from RNA and proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 59, 777–784 (1968).

Nomura, M. & Erdmann, V. A. Reconstitution of 50S ribosomal subunits from dissociated molecular components. Nature 228, 744–748 (1970).

Culver, G. M. & Noller, H. F. Efficient reconstitution of functional Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits from a complete set of recombinant small subunit ribosomal proteins. RNA 5, 832–843 (1999).

Herold, M. & Nierhaus, K. H. Incorporation of six additional proteins to complete the assembly map of the 50S subunit from Escherichia coli ribosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8826–8833 (1987).

Agalarov, S. C., Sridhar Prasad, G., Funke, P. M., Stout, C. D. & Williamson, J. R. Structure of the S15,S6,S18-rRNA complex: assembly of the 30S ribosome central domain. Science 288, 107–113 (2000).Insights into the assembly of the small ribosomal subunit. The binding of protein S15 to the central domain of 16S ribosomal RNA is found to induce and stabilize a structural reorganization of the rRNA necessary for binding of subsequent r-proteins.

Gomez-Lorenzo, M. G. et al. Three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy localization of EF2 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 80S ribosome at 17.5 Å resolution. EMBO J. 19, 2710–2718 (2000).

Ibba, M. & Soll, D. Quality control mechanisms during translation. Science 286, 1893–1897 (1999).

Nissen, P., Kjeldgaard, M. & Nyborg, J. Macromolecular mimicry. EMBO J. 19, 489–495 (2000).

Fourmy, D., Yoshizawa, S. & Puglisi, J. D. Paromomycin binding induces a local conformational change in the A-site of 16S rRNA. J. Mol. Biol. 277, 333–345 (1998).

Pioletti, M. et al. Crystal structures of complexes of the small ribosomal subunit with tetracycline, edeine and IF3. EMBO J. 20, 1829–1839 (2001).

Belova, L., Tenson, T., Xiong, L., McNicholas, P. M. & Mankin, A. S. A novel site of antibiotic action in the ribosome: interaction of evernimicin with the large ribosomal subunit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3726–3731 (2001).

Heffron, S. E. & Jurnak, F. Structure of an EF-Tu complex with a thiazolyl peptide antibiotic determined at 2.35 Å resolution: atomic basis for GE2270A inhibition of EF-Tu. Biochemistry 39, 37–45 (2000).

Vogeley, L., Palm, G. J., Mesters, J. R. & Hilgenfeld, R. Conformational change of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) induced by antibiotic binding. Crystal structure of the complex between EF-Tu. GDP and aurodox. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17149–17155 (2001).

Lafontaine, D. L. & Tollervey, D. Birth of the snoRNPs: the evolution of the modification-guide snoRNAs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 383–388 (1998).

Stage-Zimmermann, T., Schmidt, U. & Silver, P. A. Factors affecting nuclear export of the 60S ribosomal subunit in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3777–3789 (2000).

Ho, J. H., Kallstrom, G. & Johnson, A. W. Nmd3p is a Crm1p-dependent adapter protein for nuclear export of the large ribosomal subunit. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1057–1066 (2000).

Gadal, O. et al. Nuclear export of 60S ribosomal subunits depends on Xpo1p and requires a NES-containing factor Nmd3p that associates with the large subunit protein Rpl10p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3405–3415 (2001).

Moy, T. I. & Silver, P. A. Nuclear export of the small ribosomal subunit requires the ran-GTPase cycle and certain nucleoporins. Genes Dev. 13, 2118–2133 (1999).

Kressler, D., Linder, P. & de La Cruz, J. Protein trans-acting factors involved in ribosome biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7897–7912 (1999).

Venema, J. & Tollervey, D. Ribosome synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 261–311 (1999).

Li, Z., Pandit, S. & Deutscher, M. P. RNase G (CafA protein) and RNase E are both required for the 5′ maturation of 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 18, 2878–2885 (1999).

Li, Z., Pandit, S. & Deutscher, M. P. Maturation of 23S ribosomal RNA requires the exoribonuclease RNase T. RNA 5, 139–146 (1999).

Deutscher, M. P. & Li, Z. Exoribonucleases and their multiple roles in RNA metabolism. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 66, 67–105 (2000).

Watch the video: and - RNA Processing and Translation (January 2022).