I've seen this in October 2016 on Corsica (Island of France):
I would guess each one is about 5cm - 15cm in diameter. Obviously, they come in small groups.
Most fungi need to be studied under a microscope to determine a species. I think this belongs to the genus of Pholiota. I couldn't find an English name, if I translate the Dutch name, it would be 'Bundle mushroom'. This name refers to the fact that they always grow in groups, usually on (dead) trees or trunks.
At first look thought this was a Honey fungus, but these are parasitic so usually don't grow on dead wood.
Onychomycosis, also known as tinea unguium,  is a fungal infection of the nail.  Symptoms may include white or yellow nail discoloration, thickening of the nail, and separation of the nail from the nail bed.   Toenails or fingernails may be affected, but it is more common for toenails to be affected.  Complications may include cellulitis of the lower leg.  A number of different types of fungus can cause onychomycosis, including dermatophytes and Fusarium.  Risk factors include athlete's foot, other nail diseases, exposure to someone with the condition, peripheral vascular disease, and poor immune function.  The diagnosis is generally suspected based on the appearance and confirmed by laboratory testing. 
Onychomycosis does not necessarily require treatment.  The antifungal medication terbinafine taken by mouth appears to be the most effective but is associated with liver problems.   Trimming the affected nails when on treatment also appears useful. 
There is a ciclopirox-containing nail polish, but there's no evidence that it works.  The condition returns in up to half of cases following treatment.  Not using old shoes after treatment may decrease the risk of recurrence. 
It occurs in about 10 percent of the adult population.  Older people are more frequently affected.  Males are affected more often than females.  Onychomycosis represents about half of nail disease.  It was first determined to be the result of a fungal infection in 1853 by Georg Meissner. 
Older classification Edit
Slime molds, as a group, are polyphyletic. They were originally represented by the subkingdom Gymnomycota in the Fungi kingdom and included the defunct phyla Myxomycota, Acrasiomycota, and Labyrinthulomycota. Slime molds are now divided among several supergroups, none of which is included in the kingdom Fungi.
Slime molds can generally be divided into two main groups.
- A plasmodial slime mold is enclosed within a single membrane without walls and is one large cell. This "supercell" (a syncytium) is essentially a bag of cytoplasm containing thousands of individual nuclei. See heterokaryosis.
- By contrast, cellular slime molds spend most of their lives as individual unicellular protists, but when a chemical signal is secreted, they assemble into a cluster that acts as one organism.
Modern classification Edit
In more strict terms, slime molds comprise the mycetozoan group of the amoebozoa. Mycetozoa include the following three groups:
- or myxomycetes: syncytial, plasmodial, or acellular slime molds or dictyostelids: cellular slime molds : amoeboid slime-molds that form fruiting bodies
Even at this level of classification there are conflicts to be resolved. Recent molecular evidence shows that, while the first two groups are likely to be monophyletic, the protosteloids are likely to be polyphyletic. For this reason, scientists are currently trying to understand the relationships among these three groups.
The most commonly encountered are the Myxogastria. A common slime mold that forms tiny brown tufts on rotting logs is Stemonitis. Another form, which lives in rotting logs and is often used in research, is Physarum polycephalum. In logs, it has the appearance of a slimy web-work of yellow threads, up to a few feet in size. Fuligo forms yellow crusts in mulch.
The Dictyosteliida – cellular slime molds – are distantly related to the plasmodial slime molds and have a very different lifestyle. Their amoebae do not form huge coenocytes, and remain individual. They live in similar habitats and feed on microorganisms. When food is depleted and they are ready to form sporangia, they do something radically different. They release signal molecules into their environment, by which they find each other and create swarms. These amoebae then join up into a tiny multicellular slug-like coordinated creature, which crawls to an open lit place and grows into a fruiting body. Some of the amoebae become spores to begin the next generation, but some of the amoebae sacrifice themselves to become a dead stalk, lifting the spores up into the air.
The protosteloids have characters intermediate between the previous two groups, but they are much smaller, the fruiting bodies only forming one to a few spores.
Non-amoebozoan slime molds include:
- (order Acrasida): slime molds which belong to the Heterolobosea within the supergroup Excavata. They have a similar life style to Dictyostelids, but their amoebae behave differently, having eruptive pseudopodia. They used to belong to the defunct phylum of Acrasiomycota. (order Plasmodiophorida): parasitic protists which belong to the supergroup Rhizaria. They can cause cabbage club root disease and powdery scab tuber disease. The Plasmodiophorids also form coenocytes, but are internal parasites of plants (e.g., club root disease of cabbages). : slime nets, which belong to the superphylum Heterokonta as the class Labyrinthulomycetes. They are marine and form labyrinthine networks of tubes in which amoeba without pseudopods can travel.
- Fonticula is a cellular slime mold that forms a fruiting body in a "volcano" shape. Fonticula is not closely related to either the Dictyosteliida or the Acrasidae.  A 2009 paper finds it to be related to Nuclearia, which in turn is related to fungi. 
Slime molds begin life as amoeba-like cells. These unicellular amoebae are commonly haploid and feed on bacteria. These amoebae can mate if they encounter the correct mating type and form zygotes that then grow into plasmodia. These contain many nuclei without cell membranes between them, and can grow to meters in size. The species Fuligo septica is often seen as a slimy yellow network in and on rotting logs. The amoebae and the plasmodia engulf microorganisms.  The plasmodium grows into an interconnected network of protoplasmic strands. 
Within each protoplasmic strand, the cytoplasmic contents rapidly stream. If one strand is carefully watched for about 50 seconds, the cytoplasm can be seen to slow, stop, and then reverse direction. The streaming protoplasm within a plasmodial strand can reach speeds of up to 1.35 mm per second, which is the fastest rate recorded for any microorganism.  Migration of the plasmodium is accomplished when more protoplasm streams to advancing areas and protoplasm is withdrawn from rear areas. When the food supply wanes, the plasmodium will migrate to the surface of its substrate and transform into rigid fruiting bodies. The fruiting bodies or sporangia are what are commonly seen. They superficially look like fungi or molds but are not related to the true fungi. These sporangia will then release spores which hatch into amoebae to begin the life cycle again.
Reproduction of Physarum polycephalum Edit
Slime molds are isogamous organisms, which means their reproductive cells are all the same size. There are over 900 species of slime molds that exist today.  Physarum polycephalum is one species that has three reproductive genes – matA, matB, and matC. The first two types have thirteen separate variations. MatC, however, only has three variations. Each reproductively mature slime mold contains two copies of each of the three reproductive genes.  When Physarum polycephalum is ready to make its reproductive cells, it grows a bulbous extension of its body to contain them.  Each cell is created with a random combination of the genes that the slime mold contains within its genome. Therefore, it can create cells with up to eight different gene types. Once these cells are released, they are independent and tasked with finding another cell it is able to fuse with. Other Physarum polycephalum may contain different combinations of the matA, matB, and matC genes, allowing over 500 possible variations. It is advantageous for organisms with this type of reproductive cell to have many mating types because the likelihood of the cells finding a partner is greatly increased. At the same time, the risk of inbreeding is drastically reduced. 
Reproduction of Dictyostelium discoideum Edit
Dictyostelium discoideum is another species of slime mold that has many different mating types. When this organism has entered the stage of reproduction, it releases an attractant, called acrasin. Acrasin is made up of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, or cyclic AMP. Cyclic AMP is crucial in passing hormone signals between reproductive cells.  When it comes time for the cells to fuse, Dictyostelium discoideum has mating types of its own that dictate which cells are compatible with each other. These include NC-4, WS 582, WS 583, WS 584, WS 5-1, WS 7, WS 10, WS 11-1, WS 28-1, WS 57-6, and WS 112b. A scientific study demonstrated the compatibility of these eleven mating types of Dictyostelium discoideum by monitoring the formation of macrocysts. For example, WS 583 is very compatible with WS 582, but not NC-4. It was concluded that cell contact between the compatible mating types needs to occur before macrocysts can form. 
In Myxogastria, the plasmodial portion of the life cycle only occurs after syngamy, which is the fusion of cytoplasm and nuclei of myxoamoebae or swarm cells. The diploid zygote becomes a multinucleated plasmodium through multiple nuclear divisions without further cell division. Myxomycete plasmodia are multinucleate masses of protoplasm that move by cytoplasmic streaming. In order for the plasmodium to move, cytoplasm must be diverted towards the leading edge from the lagging end. This process results in the plasmodium advancing in fan-like fronts. As it moves, plasmodium also gains nutrients through the phagocytosis of bacteria and small pieces of organic matter.
The plasmodium also has the ability to subdivide and establish separate plasmodia. Conversely, separate plasmodia that are genetically similar and compatible can fuse together to create a larger plasmodium. In the event that conditions become dry, the plasmodium will form a sclerotium, essentially a dry and dormant state. In the event that conditions become moist again the sclerotium absorbs water and an active plasmodium is restored. When the food supply wanes, the Myxomycete plasmodium will enter the next stage of its life cycle forming haploid spores, often in a well-defined sporangium or other spore-bearing structure.
When a slime mold mass or mound is physically separated, the cells find their way back to re-unite. Studies on Physarum polycephalum have even shown an ability to learn and predict periodic unfavorable conditions in laboratory experiments.  John Tyler Bonner, a professor of ecology known for his studies of slime molds, argues that they are "no more than a bag of amoebae encased in a thin slime sheath, yet they manage to have various behaviors that are equal to those of animals who possess muscles and nerves with ganglia – that is, simple brains." 
Atsushi Tero of Hokkaido University grew Physarum in a flat wet dish, placing the mold in a central position representing Tokyo and oat flakes surrounding it corresponding to the locations of other major cities in the Greater Tokyo Area. As Physarum avoids bright light, light was used to simulate mountains, water and other obstacles in the dish. The mold first densely filled the space with plasmodia, and then thinned the network to focus on efficiently connected branches. The network strikingly resembled Tokyo's rail system.  
Slime mold Physarum polycephalum was also used by Andrew Adamatzky from the University of the West of England and his colleagues world-wide in experimental laboratory approximations of motorway networks of 14 geographical areas: Australia, Africa, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Iberia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, UK and US.   
Orange Mold On Wood Dangerous
Mold spores take a trip regularly through the air, contained within microscopic dust debris. Mold spores end up being troublesome, though, just when subjected to moisture or high loved one moisture, at which time they become current. Not all mold is harmful, though as well as among energetic spores, just specific varieties posture wellness risks.
Orange mold fairly generally takes place in yards that utilize mulch to help keep dampness needed permanently plant nutrition. In these sorts of atmospheres, nonetheless, slime mold is most likely to increase in addition to the mulch. Sometimes referred to as pet dog vomit, as a result of its colouring and flat, lumpy look, orange mold is far more unattractive compared to it is harmful.
Slime mold can additionally take the look of yellow or Orange mold. Usually, these growths are clearly illustrated in pictures of woody woodlands, as they are commonly additionally discovered on decomposing leaves and decomposing logs. Slime mold can likewise be located atop wet animal feces.
Orange mold is not an actual fungus, but is a Protista. The distinction hinges on the fact that slime molds are single-celled microorganisms, while all various other fungi are multi-celled organisms. Slime molds grow as well as relocate by sneaking as well as, at one factor in past history, were in fact thought about an one-of-a-kind pet varieties.
Cedar Apple and Juniper Rust Fungus: What It Is and The Treatment to Stop It
This type of fungus needs two host trees. So, the disease first develops on a juniper, also called a red cedar, then spreads to apple or crabapple trees. Though, some apple trees are resistant!
What are these orange balls on cedar or juniper trees?
Here's how those come to be:
First, fungal spores from in fected apples or crabapples settle onto your juniper tree in late summer or early fall.
Does cedar or juniper rust fungus hurt trees?
Nope. Those trees don't bear the burden of rust fungus. They're nothing more than a starting point.
Instead, apple and crabapple trees are usually the ones most affected.
After the galls develop the gelatinous horns in the spring, they release spores that land on apple and crabapple trees. The apple tree leaves become speckled with yellow or orange dots before dropping. As a result, fruit quality declines and may even fall off.
Is there a treatment for this fungus?
Since junipers aren't harmed by this, it's not necessary to treat them. But, you can take a proactive approach to manage the spread of this by removing any of your juniper trees that sit a few hundred feet or less from your fruit trees .
Focus your treatment on the infected apple or crabapple tree. Trees usually respond well to a few fungicide applications. But since timing is everything when it comes to successful treatment, talk to an ISA Certified Arborist® to get it right.
Can you eat cedar apple rust? Is it edible?
While they look interesting enough to eat, avoid the temptation. You shouldn’t eat those–or any affected fruits. The infection taints the fruit, making it a lower quality.
Is cedar apple rust harmful to humans?
Nope. It doesn’t harm humans! In fact, it’s okay to touch them. If you want to take action now, remove the galls by hand, and dispose of them far away from your other trees.
How can you get rid of orange mold?
If you notice small mold colonies in your home, you can usually tackle them yourself using proper equipment and procedures.
Before removing mold on your own, wear a respirator and protective gloves. This will prevent you from inhaling harmful mold spores and from developing any rashes on your skin from topical contact with mold.
Once you have protective equipment, wipe the affected area with a bleach or vinegar solution, leave it to soak (this gives the solution time to kill the mold), then wipe it away. Spray the area again to get any residual mold spores and leave it to dry.
orange mold on toilet
Keep in mind that this DIY mold removal solution is effective only for surface mold growth, namely if the contaminated material is non-porous. If the material is porous (wood, drywall, etc.), it will likely require more in-depth cleaning.
If a mold infestation is larger than one square metre, Health Canada recommends that you hire reputable and experienced mold remediation professionals to remove the mold.
If you attempt to clean a mold infestation of this size yourself, you’ll likely make the problem worse by spreading spores to other areas of the home. You could also make yourself sick through exposure to massive amounts of mold.
Professional mold remediation is a good opportunity to have the cause of the mold infestation diagnosed so you can understand what caused the mold to grow in the first place in order to prevent it from growing back.
Most people are aware of only a couple types of mold, especially black and green mold. However, mold grows in all shapes, sizes and colours, so being aware of only a couple mold types makes you more likely to overlook potentially hazardous species growing in your home.
The more you learn about mold, the better your will be able to recognize mold infestations in your home and protect your health.
Yellow Mold Facts and Tips to Remove It
There are various types of mold that can grow on various surfaces, and one of them is yellow mold. This kind of mold grows on a lot of things, from a wooden surface to bathroom and even grass clippings.
The yellow mold may not be as common as other types of mold that grow in a building, although this type often grows outside, including in the garden.
Since many people are not familiar with yellow mold, there are various misconceptions about the characteristics and even danger of this mold. Make sure you understand about yellow mold facts, including the right way to remove it.
What is Yellow Mold?
Yellow mold is often referred as “slime mold”, because the colony looks like bright slime when seen at a glance. A large colony of mold often shows actual fungi head growths, which look like tiny mushrooms.
There are several types of mold that can produce a yellow hue, such as Aspergillus, Meruliporia incrassata, and Serpula lacrymans.
Aspergillus is the most common genus of mold that may produce yellow hue. It can grow anywhere, from wooden surfaces, to tiles, and even foods.
Serpula lacrymans is a type of mold that often grows on wood, whether inside a building or on trees. Meanwhile, Meruliporia incrassate is a type of yellow mold that is often quite toxic.
Is Yellow Mold Toxic?
While it looks striking thanks to its bright color, there are still some misconceptions about yellow mold, especially among home owners. Yellow mold is not a super dangerous organism that will poison the inhabitants.
Healthy people with a good immune system may be able to live in a house with yellow mold, but the danger is present for vulnerable groups, such as babies and people with respiratory problems or compromised immune system.
Garden owners often do not know what to do when finding yellow mold on their mulch, lawn, or grass clipping. The truth is: this slime mold is a common organism that lives on plants or organic materials, but do not act as a parasite.
Yellow Mold on Bread
Bread is a type of food that is loved by fungi, especially since it contains a lot of nutrition. Fermented bread types are especially fertile for fungi, making it easy to get moldy.
Aspergillum is one type of mold that often grows on and inside bread. The mold looks like fuzzy layer on top and inside the bread, often with various colors instead of just one.
A really moldy bread usually also releases distinguished musty smell, common among a big colony of mold. Bread is often stored in the dark, warm place, making it more ideal for mold and fungi.
Yellow Mold on Mulch
Mulch, grass clipping, and compost heaps are among the most common locations for yellow mold to grow. Outside, a yellow mold is that slimy substance that you may confuse with animal feces or vomit.
The strange look often makes people worry about what will happen to their plants or gardens.
Yellow mold that you find on mulch, compost heap, or grass is generally harmless. While it looks bad, you can simply rake or scrape it.
The only danger is that if the yellow mold grows uncontrollably, especially in the garden, it can actually smother the plants and reduce nutrition intake they can take.
Yellow Slime Mold in Bathroom
Bathroom, shower, and a wet area in the kitchen are ideal spots for mold to grow, including yellow mold. These rooms are often damp and full of the residue of shampoo, soap, and dirt, which are foods for a lot of bacteria and single-cell organisms that form yellow mold.
Yellow mold often grows on spots such as shower walls or curtain, vent, near the faucets or shower head, under the sink, near the sinkhole, and in the corner of walls or floor.
If you seldom clean your bathroom thoroughly, or does not use cleaning agent with anti mold formula, it will be easy for yellow mold to grow.
Yellow Mold on Walls
Walls often become places for mold to grow, especially in the middle of the ideal situation. High humidity, moisture problem, and lack of fresh air or sunlight are factors that cause yellow mold to grow on walls.
Yellow mold on walls may grow into larger fungi colony, so you need to remove it when the problem is still small. Otherwise, you may need to replace the walls and wallpaper, or even remodel parts of your house to prevent new growth.
Yellow Mold on Wood
Slime yellow mold loves growing on an organic surface, especially wood. If your house structure has woods in hidden places, such as in the basement, ceiling, or foundation, you can experience mold problem after a while.
The yellow mold may start as little specks, but they can grow into a slimy layer that looks disgusting. If you let it grow, the mold will release musty smell and damage the structure.
How to Get Rid of Yellow Slime Mold
Removing yellow mold from any outdoor surfaces, such as grass, mulch, or compost heap is quite easy. You can just take the mold and remove it as far as possible from the vicinity of your garden.
However, if the problem persists, you may want to replace the soil and remove the moldy plants or mulch.
If the mold problem happens inside the house, you can spray the moldy surface with a mix between 1 part of white vinegar and 3 parts of water (you can replace vinegar with hydrogen peroxide or baking soda).
Let it soaks for 10 minutes before scrubbing the surface. However, if the problem happens on more than 10 meters of square area, call professional for better cleaning result.
If the yellow mold grows on bread or other foods, remove those items as soon as possible. Clean the storage or space where the moldy foods are previously stored, so there is no mold growing again.
Do not forget to always pay attention to your food’s expiry date or shelf life.
Yellow slime mold is not a pleasant sight at home. Make sure to deal with the early stage of mold problem as soon as possible, and prevent future yellow mold infestation problem inside or outside your house.
Legal Aspects of Mold Contamination
Mold contamination has become an increasing problem in homes, offices, and other indoor places across the United States. Mold can cause a lot of health problems to people who are exposed to it, and in severe cases, exposure to mold spores can even be fatal. Due to this growing concern, many different laws have been &hellip
Toxic Black Mold Symptoms, Test, Removal & Health Effects
Have you ever noticed dark patches on various spots in your home? Be careful, because those spots may be black mold. This mold is often hard to distinguish from the regular mold, but it can cause various health issues, especially among vulnerable people. If you neglect this mold long enough, it may even cause long-term &hellip
Some Easy yet Effective Ways to Take out Mold on Walls
When mold overgrows your bright walls, they let your home interior looks unattractive and humdrum. Removing the organism is not as easy as it seems. The wall is something porous so that you can’t clean it up with a wet cloth. However, have you ever known why the mold comes into sight on the wall? &hellip
Brown Mold Facts: Appearance, Risks, and How to Remove It
Brown mold is a general term for several species of mold that commonly grow on wood, although they can also appear on surfaces like tiles and walls. Like many other mold types, the brown mold is also a common sign of leak problems. Knowing the characteristics and removal tips can prevent the negative effects of &hellip
Penicillium Mold Health Effects and Removal Methods
Hearing the name “Penicillium” usually makes you imagine antibiotic or certain cheese types. However, penicillium mold is also a problem when it appears on indoor or outdoor structures in buildings. When it grows uncontrollably, its presence can bring various problems, including health concerns. Here is what you must know about Penicillium mold, including its effects &hellip
Mold in Attic: How to Stop Attic Mold Growth Permanently
Mold in attic could indeed be a permanent problem if you don’t treat it right. As the least room to use, an attic might be left unattended and eventually have molds in it. Mold in attic could indeed be a permanent problem if you don’t treat it right. As the least room to use, an &hellip
Funga Nordica: 2nd edition 2012. Edited by Knudsen, H. & Vesterholt, J. ISBN 9788798396130
Geoffrey Kibby, (2012) Genus Amanita in Great Britain, self-published monograph.
Paul M Kirk, Paul F Cannon, David W Minter & J A Stalpers (2008). Dictionary of the Fungi CABI
Taxonomic history and synonym information on these pages is drawn from many sources but in particular from the British Mycological Society's GB Checklist of Fungi and (for basidiomycetes) on Kew's Checklist of the British & Irish Basidiomycota.
Question: I am trying to identify mushrooms growing in my backyard and want to know if they are poisonous. They are amber/orange in color and small with smooth caps with gills underneath the caps. These mushrooms grow alone and in small groups. I live in the Bay Area of California. Can you help me in identifying them and how to get rid of them?
Answer: Just assume all mushrooms are poisonous unless you are truly confident that they are not. It is better to be safe than sorry.
As to identifying the ones you have growing in your yard, it would be difficult to do that just from your description.
Regarding eliminating them, that is also difficult. Most mushrooms have a vast underground growth system, and given the right conditions, they appear at times and continually spread their spores. You probably notice that under more humid conditions they seem to appear more often.
Question: I found a mushroom growing in my yard. The mushroom has a flat tan top with yellow gills, do you know what it could be?
Answer: From your description of a tan top and yellow gills, it might be a Boletus subtomentosus (Yellow-cracking Bolete), but it could also be something else. I would hesitate to give you a definite answer as to what type of mushroom you are describing.
Question: What causes mushrooms to appear in the yard?
Answer: Mushrooms like to grow on decaying matter. They also thrive in moist and humid conditions. If your yard is shaded and has heavy soil such as clay, and has poor drainage, you are more likely to see mushrooms growing.
Question: I have a dead oak that has been carved in my front yard. I have a horrifying growth of white/tan mushrooms surrounding the tree base. I have dug them up and applied fungicide to the base, but they return in greater numbers each year. They are tall, and the stalk is thick, some as thick as a man&aposs thumb. I don&apost want them to consume and rot out the base of this beautiful carving! Can I use lime? Gas? Fill in with cement? Help!
Answer: You may be pleased to know that your mushrooms may be helping to protect and nourish the roots of your tree. Look up Mycorrhiza on Wikipedia to learn more. In most cases, those types of mushrooms are symbiotic and improve soil conditions. It would be almost impossible to eliminate the massive underground network of fungi. If I am correct, you would not want to do so in any case.
Now if you had mushrooms growing directly on your dead tree carving, that would be different. That type of fungus would be actively doing its job of helping to decompose the wood. I hope this helps!
Question: How do I get rid of mushrooms, and how do I know if they are poisonous?
Answer: Just plucking mushrooms from your yard will not necessarily get rid of them since much of it grows below the ground. That being said, it can help. If you let a mushroom mature, spores will be released which can cause more mushrooms to grow. Digging them out and removing their matted roots below the ground can help. Do not throw mushrooms onto a compost pile. Instead, put them into a plastic bag and discard in the garbage. Make sure your ground drains well and has no standing water. Add sand to heavy clay soils. Aerate your lawn. De-thatch it. Remove decaying branches, grass clippings, pet waste and the like. Soapy water can sometimes help to eliminate mushrooms as can nitrogen fertilizers.
As to how to know if a mushroom is poisonous, that is not as easy to answer. Just assume that most of them are poisonous to be on the safe side. If you intend to consume them, read books and consult with experts. There are many edible mushrooms, but there are also many that are poisonous. Some of them look similar. I would rather err on the side of safety. Hope that answers some of your questions.
Question: What are the penis-shaped mushrooms growing under my tree?
Answer: That phallic-shaped mushroom which has a foul odor much like rotting flesh has the name Phallus impudicus. It is also known as the common stinkhorn. Flies and other insects are attracted by its smell and are responsible for spreading the spores.
Question: After having an egg color from the beginning, what causes wild mushrooms to become dark in color?
Answer: As most mushrooms age they slowly turn darker in color.
Question: I am trying to identify a mushroom that no one seems to know anything about. White soft ball, somewhat slimy, grows under soil then gets bigger and bursts open with red loops that break the ground. They end up with 4 loops that meet in the middle and make arches. It&aposs really pretty and looks velvety. They get about 12 inches before they start to shrivel up. Would you have any clues?
Answer: It might be a Cordyceps militaris type of fungus. Here are several links informing you about this particular type of mushroom. Let me know if this is the type of mushroom you have spotted in your area. Thanks!
Question: Is a mushroom, a mushroom or a fungus and if so what might have caused it?
Answer: All mushrooms come from the fungus family but not all fungus is a mushroom. Mushrooms reproduce by the dissemination of spores. Mushrooms get their nutrients from dead and decaying organic matter. So if spores have been spread by a mushroom it may lie dormant until such a time as it can start its composting of some type of available material.
© 2009 Peggy Woods
4 Major Diseases of Wheat | Plant Diseases
(iii) Brown or orange or leaf rust, P . recondita Rob. ex Desm.
Rusts of various crops are mentioned in ancient history. The writings of the Romans bear evidence that their cereal crops were attacked with rusts. During subsequent years rusts were reported from different countries of the world, but without realizing the actual reason behind the incidence.
It was Persoon in 1797, who recognized that the stem rust was due to the attack of a fungus Puccinia graminis. But the true life history of P. graminis was not known until 1865 when De Bary, by inoculation experiment, was successful to demonstrate that P. graminis needs two hosts- wheat and barberry to complete its life history.
Black rust or stem rust or black stem rust. (Puccinnia graminis Pers. f. sp. tritici Eriks. and Henn.). This disease is present in greater or less amount practically in every country throughout the world, where wheat is grown, and epiphytotics have been recorded in many countries. The disease is most damaging in moderately moist areas and in moist seasons in areas with low average rainfall.
Black stem rust is characterized by the development of the ‘red rust’ or summer stage represented by the uredial stage appearing on leaves and culms, followed a little later by the ‘black rust’ or winter stage represented by the telial stage.
With the onset of the disease, elongated brown or reddish-brown pustules or sori burst through the epidermis of the host tissue (Fig. 368C). These pustules or uredia or uredosori split open in an irregular manner having an elongated crater-like opening with ruptured host epidermis clinging to one or both sides of the opening.
The size, shape and number of sori vary with environmental conditions and parti­cularly with the inherent resistance of the host.
The uredosori may develop without any surrounding chlorotic or dead cells or they may be seated in chlorotic areas which soon become dead. They may be few in number, or they may be very numerous and may coalesce to form more or less elongated brown or rusty powdery streaks.
Within these sori are masses of reddish or rust-coloured powder consisting of thousands of minute dust-like uredospores. Later in the season the black rust stage or winter stage or telial stage appears. This consists of elongated pustules or telia or teleutosori similar in shape to the uredosori but black in colour. The black colour is due to the presence of masses of dark teleutospores they bear.
The teleutosori are dark-brown to black and are smooth rather than powdery, although the epidermis of the host tissue is broken and the teleutospores are exposed. The dark teleutospores are more firmly attached in their beds than the uredospores, and their stalks are more rigid and thicker.
They are essentially resting spores adapted for perennating on straw or stubble. The teleutospores on germination produce promycelia which again pro­duce sporidia (basidiospores). The sporidia cannot infect the cereal host, and in­fect only the alternate host, the barberry (Berberis vulgaris L.).
On the barberry, small circular yellowish spots appear on the upper surface of the leaf. These spots increase in size, become margined with a brighter colour or red­dish-purple and show a central cluster of minute honey-coloured pustules—sperm o- gonia from which minute droplets of nectar ooze out.
At more or less opposite places towards the lower surface of the leaf, yellowish or orange-coloured spots appear. Close examination of these spots on the lower surface of the leaf shows a cluster of small cups with saw-toothed edges—the aecia or cluster cups. Often the host tissue deve­loping aecia may become hypertrophied. Similar hypertrophied cluster-cup lesions may appear on the fruits and petioles.
Black stem rust is caused by Puccinia graminis Pers. f. sp. tritici Eriks. and Henn. This is a heteroecious fungus. Its principal hosts are gra­minaceous plants including wheat, oats, barley, rye, a large number of grasses and the alternating host is barberry.
A transverse section of an uredosorus shows that the mycelium is intercellular, the hyphae produce small-rounded or branched haustoria which penetrate in the host cells.
The uredospores are stalked single-celled, dikaryotic and golden-brown. The cell of the uredospore is oblong or ellipsoid with four equatorially arranged germ pores, and strongly echinulate. These spores must have a film of water in the host surface before they can germinate. The uredospores can infect graminaceous hosts repeatedly.
The teleutospores follow the uredospores on the same or similar dikaryotic my­celium. Two kinds of spores may frequently be found together in the same sorus. A teleutospore is stalked consisting of two thick-walled, smooth, superimposed cells, the top cell being rounded or blunted and thickened at the apex. Each spore is dark- brown, bur-black in mass.
Each constituent cell is furnished with a germ pore, situa­ted apically in the top cell, and just below the septum in the lower cell. Each cell during development possesses a pair of nuclei contributed by the dikaryotic mycelium. When the teleutospore turns brown and matures in the teleutosorus, the paired nuclei in each cell fuse.
The mature teleutospore thus represents the diploid phase in the life history of P. graminis tritici. The teleutospores do not germinate forthwith but un­dergo a period of rest and remain dormant on stubble or straw for several months.
Like the uredospores, the teleutospores also germinate in presences of a film of water. One or both the cells of a teleutospore may give rise to a promycelium, during the formation of which the diploid nucleus undergoes a reduction division and four sporidia (basidiospores)—two of (+) strain and two of (—) strain, are formed.
The sporidia germinate on the barberry leaf in the presence of moisture. Two types of spermogonia (+) and (—) are developed near the upper epidermis of the bar­berry leaf. The spermogonia are flask-shaped structures embedded in the host tissue and opening out into a small ostiole at the epidermis. They bear spermatia and flex- uous (receptive) hyphae.
The spermatia are exuded at the ostiole in a copious nectar or honey-dew and are carried to respective (+) to (—) and (—) to(+) flexuous hy­phae through insects establishing dikaryotic condition.
The dikaryotic condition so established perpetuates through hyphal connection to the protoaecium which deve­lops close to the lower epidermis of the barberry leaf along with the development of spermogonia. Ultimately the protoaecium develops into an aecium.
The aecium when young is covered by a peridium which breaks with the maturity of the aecium. The aecium bears aeciospores in chains. The aeciospores are dikaryotic, single-celled and hexagonal in shape. The aecispores are readily dispersed by wind. They have about six germ pores in the wall.
These spores serve to return the rust to the cereal or other graminaceous host. The aeciospores germinate on the graminaceous host in the same manner as the uredospores. The spores being dikaryotic are responsible for the establishment of a dikaryotic mycelium which ultimately gives rise to uredosori on the graminaceous host.
True, P. graminis can attack any of the graminaceous hosts indicated, but it is also true that much fewer than that number of graminaceous hosts are found to be susceptible in any particular locality. This is due to the fact that P. graminis is composed of many different physiologic forms, races or varieties.
Any particular form, race or variety can attack certain species or varieties of host plants but not all of the susceptible graminaceous hosts.
The mighty Rust investigation began in Australia following the epidemic in 1889. The classical researches of Anton de Bary and the Tulasne brothers had long since established the parasitism of the rust fungi.
Between 1892 and 1896 Carleton grew various cereals in pots in a greenhouse and tried to infect the wheat plants with uredospore’s from the rust on the oats. The attempt failed—the spores from the rust on the oats would not infect wheat, barley or rye. And with the exception of the rust on the wheat, which did infect the barley, he found that the rust on one cereal would not infect the others.
There was not one Puccinia graminis but several, to be distinguished from one another only by the kinds of wild or cultivated grasses on which they would grow.
Meanwhile, Professor J. Eriksson (1894-96) of Sweden had already sorted the single Puccinia graminis of his botanical forefathers into six special forms:
Puccinia graminis special form avenae, to be found on oats and some half-a-dozen wild grasses Puccinia graminis special form tritici, to be found on wheat and barley and a few others of the grasses Puccinia graminis special form secalis, on rye, and so forth. These special forms of the fungus which differed so widely in their ability to parasitize the different cereals could perhaps be regarded as species in the making.
Forms in which adap­tation and natural selection had gone far to make profound physiological differences, but not far enough to alter the external appearance of the parts of the organisms in so far as those alterations could be seen by man with the aids to vision available.
Were these special forms of Puccinia graminis really species in an early stage of differentiation? Subspecies? Adapted species? Physiologic forms? Biologic races? Biologic forms? Physiologic races?
H. M. Ward (1905) encountered a similar type of specialization toward species of Bromus. He was of opinion that the host substrate influenced the pathogenicity of a given race.
E. C. Stakman and his associates made intensive study of the physiologic races of Puccinia graminis and indicated that the physiologic races are best defined by the effect upon different hosts. The physiologic races may or may not be stable. New phy­siologic races may arise in nature through gene mutations and also by genetic, recombinations of characters in the process of sexual reproduction.
Physiologic races in so far as barberry is concerned are unknown. All physiologic races of graminaceous hosts, in so far as is known, infect barberry. When this host is infected, the pathogenic difference between races no longer exists. As such, it appears that the monokaryotic mycelium of rusts has as a rule pathogenic properties distinct from those of the dikaryotic mycelium.
The pathogen perennates as teleutospores which remain dor­mant on stubble or straw of graminaceous hosts for several months. They are known to be viable for at least 18 months. Teleutospores serve, indirectly, to convey the disease to the alternate host, the barberry. They must be wetted before they germi­nate.
The most favourable temperature for germinaton is 19°C. to 21 °C. P. graminis being heterothallic, of the four sporidia formed by the teleutospore germination two belong to (+) and two of (—).
The sporidia are dispersed by air currents and fall on the barberry host and infect young stems, petioles and leaves by direct penetration of the cuticle. Infection may take place during the day or night but is favoured mostly by daylight. Two types (+) and (—) of spermogonia are produced by the respective (+) and (—) sporidia.
The function of spermogonia was established by Craigie in 1927. Following transfer of (+) spermatia to (—) flexous hyphae and vice versa— spermatization by flies or raindrops, dikaryotic condition is established resulting in the formation of aecia and aeciospores. The aeciospores dropping from the aecia are caught up by air currents and are carried to the graminaceous hosts.
The aeciospores germinate in presence of a film of water, form appressoria, penetration always through the stomata, and each forms a vesicle in the substomatal chamber from which di­karyotic hyphae ramify intercellularly into the parenchymatous tissue resulting in the formation of uredosori.
The uredospores formed in uredosori germinate on graminaceous hosts to spread infection. These spores germinate by a germ tube in a film of water.
The tip of the germ tube swells to produce an appressorium from which a narrow hypha arises which passes through stomata and invades the substomatal space where it soon expands into a vesicle. From the latter an infection hypha emer­ges, which having penetrated a mesophyll cell establishes within it.
The hypha pro­ceeds sending haustoria into the cells with which it comes into contact. From such an initial infection an uredosorus with mature spores becomes established in eight to fourteen days.
With the dissemination of the uredospores throughout the crops, fresh uredosori continue to be formed, but they usually cease to develop before the wheat begins to change colour and ripen. The development of teleutosori follows along with the slowdown of the formation uredosori as the host plant approaches maturity.
Disease cycle of Black stem rust of wheat is presented in Figure 369.
Since sporidia cannot infect the graminaceous hosts and the source of inoculum of wheat infection is the aeciospores it is logical to con­clude that both wheat and barberry hosts are essential for the annual recurrence of the disease. The pathogen perennates as teleutospores in the stubbles and straw of graminaceous host.
Eriksson in 1894 in his ‘Mycoplasm theory’ suggested that during the active wheat growing season, the fungal hyphae attack the wheat host and thereby an in­timate mixture of the fungus protoplasm and the host protoplasm is established re­sulting in the formation of what he designated mycoplasm.
When the seeds from rust infected wheat plants bearing mycoplasm are sown, the mycoplasm splits up into the host protoplasm and fungus protoplasm. The fungus protoplasm then becomes organized into fungal hyphae and thus the infection is re-established. But Eriksson’s theory did not receive wide support.
In areas where both wheat and barberry hosts are present, the infection of the former may be initiated by aeciospores. But this ideal condition does not prevail all over India. For example, in the plains of India where barberry plants do not grow for hundreds of miles but the wheat rust appears year after year. What is the expla­nation for it? Since the barberries are absent, aecial stage does not come into picture at all.
The summer heat in the plains is so intense that the survival of rust on weeds or on any other substrate is not possible. It is obvious then that the rust does not spend summer in plains.
Therefore, the first appearance of rust on wheat crop during next winter is due to the dissemination of inoculum which is most likely from uredospores from some source other than plains. The possibility of air-borne dissemination from other countries is rather nil due to natural barriers like, Indian Ocean and the Himalayas.
K. C. Mehta (1931) working in the Nilgiri Hills conclusively proved that the uredospores and teleutospores cannot survive in the plains during summer, but the uredospores can do so in the hills at an elevation of 3,000 to 5,000 ft. and above where the summer temperature is congenial and where the rust survives in the uredial stage on self-sown wheat plants or other graminaceous hosts particularly grasses, of which Briza minor has been found most suitable.
When regular wheat crop is sown in hills it is infected by the inoculum (uredospores) from Briza minor. From this infected wheat crop in the hills the disease spreads to the wheat plants growing near the foot of the hills —the Tarai regions, by wind-borne uredospores. Again from these infected wheat plants of the Tarai regions, the disease gradually spreads to the plains.
This is how Mehta explained the infection of wheat crop annually in the plains in spite of the absence of barberry plants in the plains. Mehta devised an aeroscope, a small weather cock fitted with a greased slide, on which he collected uredospores flying with air currents at different areas from hills, the Tarai regions and the plains.
Since black stem rust infection takes place during the growing season from spores produced on the barberry or on wheat plants, prevention of infection is a logical method of control.
Toward this end measures applicable are:
The growing of wheat varieties resistant to attack interruption of the life cycle of the rust-so that an important infective spore type cannot be produced eradication of grasses which serve as alternate hosts treatment of growing wheat so that spores alighting on it do not produce infection and improved cultural practices.
Wheat varieties entirely immune to black stem rust do not exist. However, var­ieties resistant in various degrees are numerous. Since a large number of physiologic races greatly complicates the problem of developing varieties resistant to black stem rust, continuous processes of breeding, improvement and replacements will be use­ful to evolve new resistant varieties.
Varieties of wheat that are not resistant to the fungus but that mature early may escape serious rust damage.
Control by interference with the life history of the rust fungus is another means to reduce the incidence of the disease. Since the perennating stage of the rust is able to infect only the barberry, eradication of the barberry should remove the link nece­ssary for .carrying infection over from the crop of one year to that of the next.
Eradi­cation of barberry not only serves to remove infection of wheat by aeciospores, but also, it eliminates the possibility of recombination of genes in the fungus and the pro­duction of new races. Eradication of barberry, however, does not prevent infection from- uredospores.
In India, one of the effective control measures is to discontinue wheat cultivation in the hills and eradication of grasses like Briza minor and Bromus japonicus which serve as hosts on which fungus harbours when wheat season is over.
Experimental work has shown that reduction in stem rust infection accompanied by increases in yields can be obtained if growing wheat is dusted with sulphur at intervals of 4 days before heading time.
Some positive results have also been obtained by chemical control of the disease. Immediately with the appearance of rust symp­toms, the crop should be sprayed 3 to 4 times with dithiocarbamate fungicides (Di- thane Z-78, Dithane M-22, and Dithane S-31) at the rate of 1 Kg. per acre. Dusting of crop with sulphur for 2 to 3 times at the rate of 6 Kg. per acre is also recommended.
Four to five applications of Nabam and zinc sulphate starting from initial stage of attack of the disease have proved to be effective in controlling the disease.
Besides these, the use of organic nickel salts some of the antibiotics, e.g., actidione and related products sulpha-compounds such as, sulphadiazine, sulphapyrazine, and sulphapyridine have given satisfactory results. Soil or seed treatment with systemic fungicides—plantvax gives effective control of the disease.
Certain items in the cultural practices of wheat-growing may contribute to a reduction in losses due to rust infection. Drainage facilities, date of sowing and ma­turing of crop, and the use of fertilizers all play a part. A better opportunity i» affor­ded for rust infection and spread on low-lying wheat fields.
Hence wheat cultivation should be avoided in low-lying fields. Early maturing varieties of wheat are prefer­able as they have a greater chance of escaping rust infection than late-maturing varieties. Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers promotes excessive growth of the rust fungus. A judicious application of phosphates, however, is necessary to coun­teract the harmful effects of excessive nitrogenous fertilizers.
Yellow or Stripe Rust:
Yellow or stripe rust (yel­low rust) rarely ruins the wheat crop in India to the same extent as black stem rust. It is particularly limited to Northern and Eastern parts of India.
The disease is often accountable for very serious losses in the field, due to destruction of the foliage, fol­lowed in some cases by sterility of spikelets or in the production of badly shrivelled grain. But in general, the infection is chiefly confined to the leaves, only in case of severe attack it spreads over to the leaf sheath, the stalk, and even to the glumes.
Due to infection, the green colour of the leaves first of all fades in long streaks, and later, as small pustules of uredosori arise along them, a distinct yellow striped effect is produced in the leaves (Fig. 368A). The uredosori appear as bright-yellow pustules.
They are sub-epidermal and remain covered for a much longer time than in the other rusts, but when they finally break through, the yellow uredospores are shed and dispersed by wind.
The uredospores are spherical to ovate in shape, dikaryotic, and very variable in size. The spore wall is colourless, minutely echinulate and may have six to sixteen germ pores which are scattered, whereas, in the black stem rust the germ pores are equatorial in position and are four in number.
As the host matures the teleutosori appear on the leaf sheaths, glumes, but rarely on the leaf blade. The teleutosori always develop abundantly on the leaf sheaths. It is very infrequent that the teleutospores and uredospores occur together in the same sorus, as is often the case in the black stem rust.
The teleutosori are compact, appear as dull black spots, arranged in rows very similar to the uredosori. They do not, however, as in the black stem rust, break through the epidermis at all, but re­main as flat black crusts. The teleutospores are dark-brown and flattened at the top in contact with the host epidermis (Fig. 370A).
They are two-celled inserted with brown unicellular paraphyses. The teleutospores on being released can germinate immediately without any rest. It is a heteroecious rust but no alternate host has so far been found.
The uredospores are capable of withstanding very low temperatures and serve as the source of inoculum to spread infection through grass hosts from the hills, as is encountered in case of black stem rust incidence in India. There is also evidence that this rust can perennate as mycelium in the wheat leaf or in various grasses. With the advent of favourable season the perennating mycelium produces uredosori.
The effective control of yellow rust disease is through the development of resis­tant varieties of wheat by hybridization of favourable types of wheat. Satisfactory results have, however, been obtained by using calcium cyanamide as an effective fungicide.
Brown or Orange or Leaf Rust:
This is known as brown rust or orange rust or leaf rust of wheat. In general, it is rather com­mon in the Northern and Eastern parts of India and occurs along with the yellow rust causing damage to the wheat crop in some parts of Bihar, the Punjab and the United Provinces.
This disease is favoured by the same climatic conditions as those which favour black stem rust, but brown rust can develop over a wide range of temperature, par­ticularly at temperatures below 15°C.
Rust infection is mainly confined to the leaves, rarely occurring on the stems and ears. In cases of heavy infection photosynthesis is retarded, the affected leaves turn yellow and wither early. Consequently the ears become retarded reducing in the grade, yield, and quality of grain.
The uredosori appear only on the leaves, very rarely on the leaf sheaths and stalks. They do not arise in rows or Stripes as in yellow rust but are grouped in small clus­ters or irregularly scattered (Fig. 368B). The uredosori break out from under the epidermis as orange or brown specks.
They are round to slightly oblong in shape. The uredospores are brown and spherical with minutely echinulate wall (Fig. 370B) furnished with seven to ten germs pores.
The teleutosori are very rarely produced. When formed, they are scattered chiefly on the underside of the leaf and on the leaf sheaths having similarity with those of yellow rust and do not break through the epidermis. The teleutospores re­semble those of yellow rust in size and shape but the teleutosorus is divided into small groups by the interpolation of paraphyses (Fig. 370C).
The teleutospores are oblong with slightly constricted at the septum and possessing rounded apex with prominent thickening.
Thalictrum flavum is the alternate host of this rust. Its role in the annual recurrence of this rust has not been established in India.
This rust, however, pere­nnates as uredospores on self-sown wheat plants in the hills at an altitude of 5,000 ft. and above. It is probable that brown rust can perennate as mycelium in the host leaf, and if the infected host can survive, the mycelium may produce fresh uredosori.
Though the fungus has numerous physiologic races, yet raising resistant varieties to these physiologic races would be the effective control of the disease.
Disease # 2. Hollyhock Rust of Wheat:
Hollyhock rust of wheat disease has been studied with great interest since 1852. The ori­ginal home of the disease is either Chile, where it was found to occur in 1852, or Australia, where its presence was recorded in 1857. It was found in Spain in 1867, in France in 1872, in England and Germany in 1873, in Belgium, Holland, Denmark and Italy in 1874 and in South Africa in 1875.
The first appearance of the disease in the United States on the hollyhocks was reported in 1886. This disease was introduced in the United States with imported seeds of Malope.
Since then the rust of wheat was spread all over the world. The fungus which produces this disease is too well known in general appearance and by the effects it produces. The sudden and widespread appearance year after year of the disease particularly on the Malvaceous plants has grown the keenest interest for the study of the disease.
In 1852 Bertero first observed in Chile the appearance of the Hollyhock rust on different kinds of Malvaceous plants on which it was very common. He sent his collections to Montagne, who diagnosed, described and named the causal organism of the disease Puccinia maluacearum Bertero, which is the cause of a widespread disease of Althaea, Malva and related genera of the family Malvaceae.
The fungus is one of the most noticeable of the Uredinales being truly plurivorous, i.e., attacks a number of hosts so far from being confined to a species it is not even confined to a genus. It can spread on all green parts of all Malvaceous plants if they are grown side by side. In all the plants the appearance of the disease is identical and by artificial inoculations it was proved that it can be transferred from genus to genus.
It is an autoecious rust of wheat which produces only one form of spore, the teleutospore, and has therefore been classified in the group Lepto-peccinia. The Uredo and Aecium forms are wanting. The teleutospores are formed in sori. The sori are again formed scattered simultaneously on the leaf blade, petiole and stem.
They are very prominent and stand up almost like beads from the surface of the host and are more abundant upon the under than the upper side of the leaf, but arise any­where on the leaf even upon the long petioles. The sori are about 1 to 2 mm in dia­meter.
The infection is very much localized, that is, confined to a small area imme­diately in connection with the sorus. This is especially true of the leaves but on the petioles and stems the sori may be much longer than broad and running some dis­tance up and down the petiole and stem from the point of infection.
The sori on the petioles and stems are covered by the epidermal layer of the host for a longer time than is the case with the sori on the leaves. Upon the petiole the mycelium works more readily and more extensively, giving the sorus more strikingly the appearance of an eruption.
Puccinia malvacearum Bert. The teleutospores are ob­long to oblong-fusiform, two-celled, rarely somewhat elliptical, smooth light-yellow slightly constricted at the septum and acute to slightly rounded but not thickened apex. The two cells are more or less of the same shape and size, narrowed each way from the septum, hyaline and persistent.
Pedicels are firmly attached to the tissues of the host plant which bear them by well-developed mycelium and hence they re­main attached to their host tissue until the mycelium causes the dissolution of all vegetable substances. The teleutospores germinate in a damp atmosphere upon the host plant as soon as they are mature without any resting period by throwing a four- celled promycelium.
The sporidia are formed in one of the two ways:
(i) The four cells of the promycelium may separate into four free and independent cells, each of these cells later sends out a little protrusion which elongates and swells up as the con­tent of the mother cell is gradually passed into it, and thus a mature sporidium is formed, which readily breaks away from the basal cell and germinates
(ii) In the other type, the four cells of the promycelium do not break apart but each sends out little sterigma, which gradually swells up until the sporidium is formed into which the content of the promycelial ceil is passed. The sporidium is then abstricted and ger­minates. The sporidia are oval or spherical or subreniforai. The sporidia are carried by wind readily and are lodged on the leaf, where infection takes place.
They are the source of secondary infection and can spread the disease very rapidly. The spo­ridia produce germ tubes in 24 to 48 hours, which immediately bore through the cuticular cells of the host.
Playwright observed two kinds of teleutospores:
(i) roundish masses of teleutospores are clear brown and germinate at once
(ii) the other form occurs more upon the veins of the leaves, but especially upon the stem, in more elongated sori.
These spores are darker in colour and do not germinate immediately. The entire sorus becomes detached from the stem and falls upon the ground where it probably remains until the next year.
The fungus becomes active as soon as the winter is over. Epi­demics are regulated by the frequency of rains and dampness in the summer season. Usually it is not active in the spring and early summer as it is in late summer or au­tumn. The host plants suffer severely in September and October.
The teleutospores germinate very rapidly at 15°C. with suitable moisture. The-first visible sign of infection is tiny white spot or pustule on the under surface of the leaf, indicating the grouping of hyphae. The rate of development of the hyphae is independent of the host, but varies appreciably with the temperature.
Germ tube formation starts within 24 hours after infection, penetration occurring at the point of the epidermal wall to which the sporidium is adherent. A minute pore is formed at the point of contact. The germ tube then slowly works itself in. Infec­tion never occurs through a stoma.
The germ tube then elongates and in three days it becomes branched with many transverse septa. The branches (infection hyphae) then pass into adjacent cells and in the intercellular spaces. Profuse branching of mycelium takes place in all directions. This vegetative mycelium becomes both inter- and intracellular and ramifies very rapidly in all directions of the host tissue.
The change in colour of the pustule from white to pale-yellow marks the initiation of the dikaryophase. This somewhat suggests the homothallic nature of the fungus. The colour becomes deeper and deeper until finally the epidermis is ruptured, and the rusty brown teleutospores are exposed.
The teleutospores germinate as soon as they are ripe. At first, fusion between the two nuclei takes place. The diploid nucleus migrates in the promycelium where as a result of reduction division four haploid nuclei are formed. Ultimately from the four- celled promycelium four sporidia are formed. Sporidia are discharged at binucleate stage.
Under cultural condition sporidia produce germ tubes within 10 to 24 hours after infection. The fungus is readily transmitted from Althaea rosea to Malta rotundifolia or Malva crispa, and vice versa by artificial cross-inoculation.
Both intra- and intercellular hyphae cause disorganisation of the host tissue. The hyphae extend inwards in the intercellular spaces of the cortical parenchyma, making a very definite attack on the starch sheath. Strands of mycelium pass into tie vascular bundle by way of the less resistant phloem rays, and then ramify among the tissues of the phloem.
Branches of mycelium extend to the parenchyma within the circle of vascular bundles. The mycelial branches attack the tissues of the stem in the similar manner.
In the petiole there is a definite attack on the starch sheath, medullary rays and the phloem elements of the vascular bundle. The attack of the pathogen causes a marked diminution of starch in the cells of the endodermis and the phloem-rays. The nature of invasion is practically restricted in certain areas.
Due to the fungal attack the cellulose thickenings on the cell walls of the collenchyma tissue disappear gradually as the mycelium advances between the cells. During the early stage the cells elongate. The pericycle fibres of the vascular bundle of both stem and petiole turn out to be almost devoid of thickening.
Due to the attack of the pathogen transpiration rate of the host tissue in increased. This may be due to the fact that the infected host cells have lost their power to retain water. At the same time the enhancement of the rate of transpiration is further helped by the ruptured epidermis due to fungal attack.
The infected leaves wither and dry up very rapidly. Very often the leaves take a scorched appearance long before the appearance of flowers. Such an abnormality may be due to rapid growth of mycelium in the host tissue. In many cases even flowers fail to appear.
In some extreme cases entire annihilation of the hollyhocks has been reported, as a result of which many growers have discontinued to cultivate them.
Disease cycle of Hollyhock rust is very similar to the secondary cycle of Black stem rust of wheat as indicated in Figure 369.
Various control measures have been suggested by many workers which may be summarized as follows:
Destroy all old infected stems and leaves immediately after flowering to reduce the source of primary inoculum.
(a) Planting in crowded plots should be categorically avoided, as closer planting gives more chance for the spread of infection. So best way is to plant the seedlings in isolated rows.
(b) Application of copper sulphate fungicide to the soil in weak solution (1 to 3 per cent.) has some effect in reducing the virulence of the disease.
(c) Dusting once a week with a fine grade of sulphur before flowering is useful.
(d) Infection may also be satisfactorily controlled by frequent spraying with lime-sulphur (1 in 60 to 1 in 100) from spring to summer, or with Bordeaux mixture (4-4-0) spraying several times during the season. The application of sulphur spray should be completed before blooming otherwise it may cause burning of the flowers.
(e) Application in the infected areas with a sponge the following mixture is a cheap and effective method of control of the disease:
Permanganate of Potash—2 to 5 table spoonful’s.
(f) Application of lime-sulphur in the seed-bed at a concentration of 1 in 40, yields good control of the ‘disease and at the same time causes no injury to the host plants.
(g) Application of summer spray with Bentonite sulphur prepared by fusing fluid sulphur is very effective. This fungicide does not produce any caustic effect to the host tissue and is more adhesive than any other sulphur. Moreover it is cheaper and is not washed away readily.
Disease # 3. Loose Smut of Wheat:
Loose smut of wheat is the most early recognized of all wheat diseases because of the characteristic dusty appearance of diseased heads, an appearance that has given it such common name as smut, black head, blasted head, snuffy ear and black smut.
An important difference between this and other smuts of wheat is that the infection is carried over from season to season within the seed and not as spores on the surface of the seed.
The incidence of the disease is common in almost all the wheat- growing regions of the world. Prior to 1888 not much differences Were indicated- aetween the loose smuts of wheat, bailey and oats. It was Maddox in 1895 who first showed the nature of loose smut of wheat. Maddox’s work was later confirmed by Brefeld in 1903.
Loose smut is recognizable as soon as the affected head emerges rom the leaf sheath, usually about the same time as, or very often in advance of, the leads of healthy plants.
Loose smut of wheat is easily distinguishable from stinking smut and flag smut of wheat being characterized by the complete destruction of spike- ets, whereas stinking smut is confined to the kernels, leaving the glumes intact, and lag smut attacks the leaves and culms.
The smutted head consists of deformed spike- et filled with black, dry, powdery masses of spores, known as brand spores or jhlamydospores at first covered by a delicate membrane, which soon bursts md exposes the powdery spores.
The glumes and kernels are completely disintegrated and soon after emergence the wind blows the powdery mass of spores having only the bare rachis which is not attacked by the fungus.’Usually all spikelets n a head are destroyed but occasionally only a part of a head is affected.
Ordinarily all the heads on a plant are affected, and while the smut is confined mostly to the jars, sometimes dark streaks of spore formation may occur also on the leaves and ess often on the stem. In dry weather the spores are blown in clouds throughout he crop when the healthy heads are in bloom. During intermittent brief intervals ,when the spikelets are open for pollination, infection of the flowers takes place.
Loose smut of wheat is caused by the fungus Ustilago uda var. tritici Schaf. The chlamydospores are pale-olive, more or less spherical in hape or occasionally oval, minutely echinulate, and measure 5 to 9 /n in diameter.
They germinate by germ tube which develops to become a promycelium of four unin­ucleate cells. No sporidia are produced. The spores retain their vitality for 5 or 6 months, a much shorter period than in the other cereal smuts. The fungus is not apable of a saprophytic life in the soil.
The name for the fungus causing loose smut of wheat is mostly a matte, taxonomic opinion rather than of nomenclature. For quite some time the fungus w. named as U. tritici (Pcrs.’ Rostr, which was later replaced by the name U. nuda (Jens. Rostr. G. W. Fischer says that Ustilago nuda (Jens.) Rostr. and U. titici (Pers.) Rostr. are indistinguishable.
Since U. nuda was published first, it is the correct name. But some feel that the two species are distinguishable and therefore the name U. tritici should be retained. Again others prefer to use the name U. nuda var. tritici Schaf. than using the name U. nuda (Jens.) Rostr.
The spore masses on smutty heads are broken up and scattered by wind, rain, and other agencies just at the time when the healthy heads of adjacent plants are in flowering stage. Innumerable spores lodge between the glumes and reach the feathery stigmas.
Spores caught up on the stigmas of the flowers, germinate on the moist stigmatic fluid, put forth promycelia. The promycelium becomes septate, but the dikaryophase is established by fusion of germ tubes derived from the individual unincleate cells of the promycelium and ultimately infection hyphae are produced.
Spores are short-lived, rarely survive more than a few days under normal conditions. Spore germination occurs in moisture and only <m the feathery stigmas of normal wheat flowers. It was earlier thought that the point of entry of the infection hyphae was the stigma of healthy flowers, but it has been shown that the normal entry point is the young tissue at the base of the ovary.
After entering in the ovary the infection hyphae pass through intercellular spaces and through the integuments and ultimately reach the ovule. The infection hyphae ultimately pass into the space between the endosperm and the nucellus and move round the bottom of the endosperm to reach the scutellum and the embryo.
Growth of the infection hyphae is exclusively intercellular, there are no haustoria, and the host cells are not affected in the slightest degree by the presence of the parasite. Simultaneously with this process, pollination, fertilization and embryo formation take place in the heads. The fungal mycelium continues to grow along with the development of seeds.
Fungal infection in no way hampers the grain forma­tion. The fungal mycelium becomes somewhat thick-walled, remains dormant in the seed, and from superficial examination at harvest time, the infected grain cannot be distinguished from the perfectly normal grain.
In the matured seed there is copious mycelium in the scutellum. The mycelium remains dormant in the seed, until the lowing growing season. When an infected wheat seed is sown, it begins to sprout, Sue dormant mycelium resumes activity, grows into the young shoots up to the growing “points and keeps pace with the development of the plant. As each head forms, there is a great accumulation of hyphae which ultimately replace the spikelets with masses of dusty spores.
The spores are ready to infect the flowers of healthy plants. The spore masses are covered by a delicate silvery membrane which bursts usually before the head emerges from the sheath, forming very dark olive-brown powdery masses in place of the spikelets, of which only the ends of the awns ordinarily escape transforma­tion.
The spores separate easily and in dry weather may be almost all blown off, leaving a bare stalk (the rachis) behind. In dry weather, clouds of spores are thrown into the air. In dry weather again the glumes of healthy flowers are rather wide open and the stigmas exposed on which the spores lodge and behave in the manner already described.
A diseased seed or plant cannot be distinguished from a healthy one until the plant begins to develop heads. As such, it is a case of seed-borne systemic infection and the fungus perennates as dormant mycelium in the seed. The severity of infection is influenced by moisture and temperature prevailing during the dissemination and germination of spores, and the duration of flowering stage.
In many regions the loose smut of wheat is of little economic importance because it occurs in small amounts. Again, there are areas where the damage is considerable since the infection is very severe.
Disease cycle of Loose Smut of wheat is presented in Figure 371.
Seed treatment with fungicides in the form of dips or dusts such as are employed with other diseases of cereals is of no value, since the infection is internally see-borne as a dormant mycelium. An effective method must kill the internal myce­lium. The only effective method thus far developed for controlling loose smut of wheat is the hot water seed treatment.
This consists essentially of soaking the seeds in hot water for a sufficient time, the object being to destroy the infection within the seeds without harming the embryos. The exact method of providing the hot water and handling the seeds can be variable according to convenience.
The hot- water seed treatment method requires great care since by the same treatment mycelium will be destroyed but the embryo should be saved from the heating effect. The embryo being a very delicate structure special care should be taken at every step.
The recommended procedure will be: (t) carry out the treatment in small lots of seeds, (it) soak the seeds in cold water for 4 to 6 hours to ensure complete wetting of all the seeds, (tit) immerse the seeds in warm water at 120°F. for one minute for a brief dip, (iv) finally immerse the seeds in water held at 129°F. for 10 minutes or within a range of 124°F. to I30°F., (v) remove the seeds from warm water and dip in cold water to stop the action of heat, (vi) spread out seeds in a thin layer to dry, quickly to avoid moldiness or deter­ioration, and (vii) sow the seeds or dry thoroughly and store for later use.
Since even good sound seed has from 6 to 10 per cent, of the grains injured by the heat, it is neces­sary to increase the sowing rate. Bad seed may suffer more heavily. Besides hot water seed treatment the disease may, however, be controlled by having special seed-raising areas being protected from the prevailing winds at flowering time to reduce the risk from blown spores, and no wheat fields should be closer than 500 yards.
Field of other crops and surrounding trees acting as windbreakers often will help to reduce external infection. The seed-plot should be large enough to allow for loss in cleaning and selecting the seed and still provide enough for the field sowings.
Growing a crop in a dry area for a season, where the conditions of humidity would be so low as to inhibit spore germination at the flowering time may yield infection-free crop without seed-treatment. It is always recommended that seeds for sowing should be procured from certified disease-free supplying concern.
Some claims have been made from the Punjab that loose smut of wheat can be controlled by a sun heating method. In the Punjab, where summer temperatures are usually very high, sun heating treatment is in practice with great amount of success.
The seeds are spread in shallow flatbottom open containers and covered with water having water-level about 2 inches above the layer of seeds. The containers are then placed in the sun for about five hours from early in the mornilig. The water is then poured off from the containers and the soaked wheat seeds are spread in sun to dry.
The direct action of hot summer sun rays produces two effects: (i) the newly grown young hyphae developed from dormant mycelium get killed, and (ii) the seeds gets dried at the same time.
The most effective control is, however, to produce and introduce resistant vatieties. Great attention is being paid along this line with a considerable success. The whole programme of breeding resistant varieties often becomes complicated, since along with the new resistant varieties there develop fresh physiologic races of the causal organism almost simultaneously to defeat the whole purpose.
Loose smut of wheat can be effectively controlled by soaking wheat seeds in fungicides like Chlorex, Purex, Ceresan, and Vitavax.
Disease # 4. Bunt of Wheat:
Bunt of wheat, also called stinking smut of wheat gets its name from the char­acteristic odour of decaying fish given off by infected ears. This is one of the most severe diseases of Middle Ages to attract attention. In 1755 Tillet was the first to es­tablish distinction between the bunt or stinking smut and the loose smut. Prevost, in 1807, described the germination of the bunt spores and the production of sporidia.
The true nature of the fungus was determined by Tulasne (1854), Kiilu (1874) and Brefeld (1883).
There are three principal bunts of wheat.
Rough-spored bunt, caused by Tilletia caries (DC). Tul. smooth-spored bunt, caused by T. foetida (Wallr.) Liro and Karnal bunt, caused by T. barclayana Sacc. and Sydow.
This disease occurs wherever wheat is grown all over the world. Its severity varies greatly, however, in different localities. The damage done by bunt fluctuates from season to season and in various localities. Losses are attributable to two separate and distinct items, namely, actual percentage of decrease in yield and the quality of the threshed grain.
Besides these, losses may be due to explosion of harvesting and threshing equipment instigated by the concentration of spores. Again the spores may produce allergic effect on man during handling of infected grains.
The disease is not evident until the wheat plant is in the heading stage. The diseased heads are usually slim compared with healthy ones, and they retain their greenish colour longer. They stand more nearly erect than healthy heads, because of their lighter weight. Stunting of growth of diseased plants is also common.
The kernel, during growth, is transformed into a spore ball, which is shorter and plumper but lighter in weight than a normal wheat grain. The spore balls are re­cognizable by their colour which is darker than that of the healthy grains.
Diseased grains retain more or less the shape and size of normal kernels. When broken open the smut balls are found to be filled with black or dark-brown powdery substance composed entirely of spores. The offensive odour announces the presence of heavy infections in the field.
Tilletia caries (DC.) Tul. The chlamydospores are of various shades of brown and are black in mass. The spore wall has reticulations ran­ging from minute shallow meshes to deep indentations. The young chlamydospores are dikaryotic, the nuclei fuse in the mature chlamydospores. On germinating the chlamydospore sends out a non-septate promycelium during which meiosis takes place.
The promycelium produces at the apex a cluster of filiform, hyaline 8 to 16 sporidia—the primary sporidia which frequently fuse in pairs to form characteristic H-shaped structures. These H-shaped structures germinate to produce mycelium on which sickle-shaped, hyaline, secondary sporidia are borne. The secondary sporidia develop infection threads which penetrate the young seedling.
Many of the spore balls are shattered during threshing and spores thus liberated lodge on the healthy kernels or are left in the soil and thereby carry the pathogen over form one crop to the next.
This is how the pathogen pere­nnates. With the return of favourable season the chlamydospores germinate to produce promycelium bearing primary sporidia where dikaryotic condition is estab­lished by the formation of H-shaped structures between the compatible sporidia.
The H-shaped structures then germinate to produce mycelium from which secondary sporidia are produced. The secondary sporidia give rise to dikaryotic infection hyphae which penetrate the wheat seedlings. Infection takes place on the young seedlings before the first leaf emerges.
Conditions suitable for infection are:
(ii) Moderate amount of soil moisture.
Following upon penetration of the coleoptile, the hyphae pass to the young shoot keeping pace with the growth of the host and cause little interference to it until the formation and development of the ears. Eventually hyphae accumulate in the ovaries, the cells of which are crushed and replaced by hyphal masses.
A rapid transformation of the hyphal mass into spores takes place filling the grain internal to the pericarp to constitute a spore ball.
Diseases cycle of Bunt of wheat is presented in figure 373.
In controlling the disease it should be carefully considered that the spores are either externally seed-borne or are in the soil where wheat seeds are sown.
Some of the effective control measures are as follows:
Visibly spore infested seeds should be rejected. Seeds from fields where there was not bunt infection are always preferable.
Seed treatment with appropriate fungicides is very effec­tive not only in destroying seed-borne spores but also in checking infection from soil- borne spores.
Some of the commonly used fungicides are:
(a) Copper sulphate solution, 2 per cent., seeds to be dipped for 5 to 10 minutes.
(b) Formaldehyde solution, 1 pint of formaldehyde in 40 gallons of water, seeds to be dipped for 5 minutes.
(c) Dusting of seeds with copper carbonate.
(d) Dipping seeds in Bordeaux mixture of 4-4-50 to 8-8-50 strength for 10 to 15 minutes.
(e) Seed treatment with Ceresan M, Agrosan GN, Spergon, and Pangon has been found very effective.
Rotation of wheat cultivation with some other crop enables to make the spores in the soil ineffective.
(iv) Cultural Practices:
Cultural practices that may reduce the rate of in­fection are:
(a) Seed sowing in relatively dry rather than moderately moist soil,
(b) Shallow rather than deep sowing in soil, and
(v) Use of Resistant Varieties:
Many satisfactory disease resistant varieties are now in use which has enabled to raise disease-free wheat. Continued effort along this line should be made to combat with the physiologic races that may upset the entire programme of breeding of disease resistant varieties. Even if resistant varieties are used, the seeds should be treated with a fungicide.